The Little Reviews

October 19, 2021 By: The Editors

A Forum for capsule review of recent books of interest to our readers. If you would like to write a capsule review (250-300 words) of one of the books featured in the Books of Interest section of our more recent print issues, we would welcome your submission at [email protected]. Please include the issue number in which the book is listed in your correspondence.

March 2, 2023 By: Bryan Counter

In literary texts, speech is often taken for granted as simply dialogue delivered by characters. But this assumption belies what occurs in speech between people in everyday life — we interpret speech, we try to see what the speaker really means, beyond what they are saying in a strict sense. Michael Lucey’s intervention with What Proust Heard is to turn a closer eye (and ear) to speech in texts (“language-in-use,” as he calls it) in order to investigate not only what particular speakers might...

July 26, 2022 By: Jacob DeBrock

Nadia Nurhussein’s 2019 book, Black Land: Imperial Ethiopianism and African America, analyzes the literature and texts being produced in response to broader Western interest in Ethiopia and its leadership during an 80-year stretch of Black history from the 1860s to the 1940s. Drawing on a wide range of materials such as poetry, novels, newspaper articles, and theatrical or cinematic performances, Nurhussein demonstrates not only how entrenched these conversations were in African Americans’ lives but also the ways that this interest created a paradox: How does one advocate for Black freedom when the focal point of the Ethiopians’ fight is a monarchy that is bent on expanding its territory, little different from the Europeans that threaten it?

April 28, 2022 By: Galen D. Bunting

“The ghost of Roger Casement / Is beating on the door.” So runs the refrain of William Butler Yeats’ “The Ghost of Roger Casement.” An imperialist who wrote scathing reports of colonial human rights abuses in the Congo and Brazil, Roger Casement sought German military aid for the 1916 Easter Rising: the British government arrested, sentenced, and hanged Casement for high treason. In her new study, The Literary Afterlives of Roger Casement, 1899-2016, Alison Garden frames her inquiry within the language of haunting and intervenes in Casement’s very indeterminacy: “towards the repetition of an unfinished history; the particularly ghostly fashioning of Casement’s literary afterlives” (14).

April 28, 2022 By: Aidan Watson-Morris

When fiction narrates speech, who is talking? Even for those who typically understand modernist fiction as skeptical of straightforward representational uses of language, scholars tend to assume that fictional characters mean the words they speak: that Bartleby would prefer not to and that Molly Bloom says yes. Elizabeth Alsop’s Making Conversation in Modernist Fiction offers a subtle, significant provocation, challenging mimetic interpretations of dialogue in modernist fiction.
Print Plus Exclusive

Making Conversation in Modernist Fiction by Elizabeth Alsop

April 28, 2022 By: Aidan Watson-Morris

Volume 6 Cycle 3

Tags:

Cover for Making Conversation in Modernist Fiction by Elizabeth Alsop
Making Conversation in Modernist Fiction. Elizabeth Alsop. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press, 2019. Pp. 212. $64.95 (cloth); $29.95 (paper); $29.95 (eBook).

When fiction narrates speech, who is talking? Even for those who typically understand modernist fiction as skeptical of straightforward representational uses of language, scholars tend to assume that fictional characters mean the words they speak: that Bartleby would prefer not to and that Molly Bloom says yes. Elizabeth Alsop’s Making Conversation in Modernist Fiction offers a subtle, significant provocation, challenging mimetic interpretations of dialogue in modernist fiction.

By staging “intersubjective and authorially orchestrated configurations” of speech (3), modernist writers attended to the “capacity for the very structures of talk to bear meaning” (4) in excess of any speaker. For instance, the contagious style that catches the characters of Virginia Woolf’s The Waves and William Faulkner’s Absalom, Absalom! destabilizes “the individual as the organizing principle of the novel” (103), even—perhaps especially—when speakers attempt to differentiate themselves. Alsop develops a rich conceptual vocabulary for distinctions between such disindividuated speech, the “hypertrophic realism” of Zora Neale Hurston (27), or the “choral voice” in Jean Toomer’s Cane (140). These and other writers—Stein, James, Hemingway, Joyce—map a modernism that, rather than emphasizing private interiority, reconsiders how speech might shape the social. Alsop’s study thus speaks to recent work by Michaela Bronstein, Julie Beth Napolin, and Lisa Siraganian. While her archive might seem restrictively canonical in its Anglo-American modernist focus, her fresh readings provide tools for further study on modernity’s myriad voices.

If modernists sever the “bond between one’s self and one’s speech” (11), they emphasize, on the one hand, the presence of the author who makes the speech, and, on the other, the autonomy of discursive forms. As such, Making Conversations in Modernist Fiction helps us appreciate both the labors of its author and the value of meticulous, formalist scholarship for illuminating the discursive structures in which we work.